https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276831 The court allowed the writ petitions, quashing the letter of intent and resident certificate. The 3rd and 4th respondents were found ineligible due to various violations, but as other candidates were not involved, direct relief to the petitioner was not granted. The court permitted the 3rd respondent to continue for a year due to operational necessity, after which the distributorship would be re-advertised. en-us Fri, 27 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 19 Nov 2018 11:25:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276831 The court allowed the writ petitions, quashing the letter of intent and resident certificate. The 3rd and 4th respondents were found ineligible due to various violations, but as other candidates were not involved, direct relief to the petitioner was not granted. The court permitted the 3rd respondent to continue for a year due to operational necessity, after which the distributorship would be re-advertised. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 27 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276831