<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (7) TMI 20 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15258</link>
    <description>The court held that the payment for technical know-how and information was capital expenditure, allowing depreciation on the capitalized portion. Entertainment expenses were not deductible post an amendment to the Act. The judgment clarified the treatment of expenditures and depreciation related to technical know-how acquisition, emphasizing the need for accurate expense categorization for tax purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 12:50:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=54258" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (7) TMI 20 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15258</link>
      <description>The court held that the payment for technical know-how and information was capital expenditure, allowing depreciation on the capitalized portion. Entertainment expenses were not deductible post an amendment to the Act. The judgment clarified the treatment of expenditures and depreciation related to technical know-how acquisition, emphasizing the need for accurate expense categorization for tax purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15258</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>