<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 880 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370537</link>
    <description>Delay was condoned, but the Special Leave Petition was dismissed, leaving no substantive relief in the matter. The Supreme Court expressly stated that the question of law was kept open, so the dismissal did not amount to a determination of the legal issue raised. The order is limited to the procedural disposal of the petition and does not decide the underlying point in dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2018 08:40:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=542571" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 880 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370537</link>
      <description>Delay was condoned, but the Special Leave Petition was dismissed, leaving no substantive relief in the matter. The Supreme Court expressly stated that the question of law was kept open, so the dismissal did not amount to a determination of the legal issue raised. The order is limited to the procedural disposal of the petition and does not decide the underlying point in dispute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370537</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>