<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 870 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370527</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, deleted the addition of the LTCG as unexplained cash credits, and upheld the genuineness of the LTCG claimed by the assessee. The decision was based on the lack of specific evidence against the assessee and the principle that suspicion cannot replace evidence in tax assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2018 12:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=542561" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 870 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370527</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, deleted the addition of the LTCG as unexplained cash credits, and upheld the genuineness of the LTCG claimed by the assessee. The decision was based on the lack of specific evidence against the assessee and the principle that suspicion cannot replace evidence in tax assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370527</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>