<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 869 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370526</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee and dismissed the appeal filed by the Revenue. The key takeaways are that the assessee was entitled to the deduction under Section 80G, the arm&#039;s length interest rate should be based on LIBOR, and disallowances under Sections 36(1)(va) and 14A were not justified. Additionally, adjustments to book profit under Section 115JB should adhere strictly to the items listed in the explanation to that section.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2018 12:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=542560" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 869 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370526</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee and dismissed the appeal filed by the Revenue. The key takeaways are that the assessee was entitled to the deduction under Section 80G, the arm&#039;s length interest rate should be based on LIBOR, and disallowances under Sections 36(1)(va) and 14A were not justified. Additionally, adjustments to book profit under Section 115JB should adhere strictly to the items listed in the explanation to that section.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370526</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>