<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (10) TMI 35 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15255</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the Tribunal was not justified in upholding the imposition of penalty under section 273(1)(b) for non-payment of advance tax. The court clarified that section 273 penalizes the failure to furnish a statement or estimate, not the non-payment of advance tax. The references were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 12:42:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=54255" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (10) TMI 35 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15255</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the Tribunal was not justified in upholding the imposition of penalty under section 273(1)(b) for non-payment of advance tax. The court clarified that section 273 penalizes the failure to furnish a statement or estimate, not the non-payment of advance tax. The references were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15255</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>