<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 849 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370506</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case back to the Commissioner (Appeals) for fresh adjudication, emphasizing the importance of adhering to principles of natural justice in tax matters. The Commissioner (Appeals) was directed to provide the appellant with an opportunity to defend their case in accordance with these principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2018 08:38:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=542538" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 849 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370506</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case back to the Commissioner (Appeals) for fresh adjudication, emphasizing the importance of adhering to principles of natural justice in tax matters. The Commissioner (Appeals) was directed to provide the appellant with an opportunity to defend their case in accordance with these principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370506</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>