<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 842 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370499</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the application for rectification concerning the eligibility for a tax rebate under the Finance Act, 1994 and the interpretation of &#039;taxable territory.&#039; The Tribunal emphasized that Section 35C(2) does not allow for altering final decisions based on disagreements with reasoning, highlighting the need for appellate remedies for legal interpretation disputes. The decision underscores the limitations of rectification processes and the importance of addressing legal issues through appropriate channels.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2018 08:38:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=542526" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 842 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370499</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the application for rectification concerning the eligibility for a tax rebate under the Finance Act, 1994 and the interpretation of &#039;taxable territory.&#039; The Tribunal emphasized that Section 35C(2) does not allow for altering final decisions based on disagreements with reasoning, highlighting the need for appellate remedies for legal interpretation disputes. The decision underscores the limitations of rectification processes and the importance of addressing legal issues through appropriate channels.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370499</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>