<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 841 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370498</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision and setting aside the duty demand, interest, and penalty. It clarified the retrospective application of Rule 6(3AA) of the Cenvat Credit Rules and emphasized the importance of interpreting statutory provisions correctly in tax matters. The appellant successfully exercised the option under the rule, leading to the reversal of the duty liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2018 07:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=542525" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 841 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370498</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision and setting aside the duty demand, interest, and penalty. It clarified the retrospective application of Rule 6(3AA) of the Cenvat Credit Rules and emphasized the importance of interpreting statutory provisions correctly in tax matters. The appellant successfully exercised the option under the rule, leading to the reversal of the duty liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370498</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>