<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 837 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370494</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, dismissing the service tax liability imposed by the Adjudicating Authority for toll fee collection as a commission agent of NHAI under Business Auxiliary Services. The Tribunal determined that toll collection by the appellant did not constitute Business Auxiliary Services provided to NHAI, aligning with precedents and legal provisions. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed based on the analysis of relevant legal provisions and previous judicial decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2018 08:37:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=542519" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 837 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370494</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, dismissing the service tax liability imposed by the Adjudicating Authority for toll fee collection as a commission agent of NHAI under Business Auxiliary Services. The Tribunal determined that toll collection by the appellant did not constitute Business Auxiliary Services provided to NHAI, aligning with precedents and legal provisions. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed based on the analysis of relevant legal provisions and previous judicial decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370494</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>