https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370477 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the order confirming a demand for clandestine removal of goods. The appellant's arguments regarding the lack of incriminating evidence, failure to establish procurement of necessary raw materials, and procedural irregularities were considered. The Tribunal found that without evidence of procuring all raw materials and the lack of cross-examination of witnesses, the charge of clandestine manufacture was not sustainable. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant with consequential relief granted. en-us Thu, 11 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 19 Nov 2018 08:36:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370477 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the order confirming a demand for clandestine removal of goods. The appellant's arguments regarding the lack of incriminating evidence, failure to establish procurement of necessary raw materials, and procedural irregularities were considered. The Tribunal found that without evidence of procuring all raw materials and the lack of cross-examination of witnesses, the charge of clandestine manufacture was not sustainable. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant with consequential relief granted. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 11 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370477