https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370472 The appeal was allowed solely on the ground of limitation as the Bench found that the appellant had correctly indicated changes in classification and there was no intent to evade duty. The invocation of the extended period for demanding differential duty was deemed unsustainable, leading to the setting aside of the impugned order. The decision to allow the appeal on the limitation ground was pronounced in the operative part of the order. en-us Wed, 03 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 19 Nov 2018 08:36:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370472 The appeal was allowed solely on the ground of limitation as the Bench found that the appellant had correctly indicated changes in classification and there was no intent to evade duty. The invocation of the extended period for demanding differential duty was deemed unsustainable, leading to the setting aside of the impugned order. The decision to allow the appeal on the limitation ground was pronounced in the operative part of the order. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 03 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370472