https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276804 Civil court jurisdiction was upheld to examine alleged illegality in a company-managed election where no clear statutory bar excluded ordinary civil remedies. A separate personal hearing was not required because the nomination rejection was decided after written representations, Committee consideration, and legal advice, so natural justice was not breached. A late amendment withdrawing a material admission was properly refused, and the plaintiff's conduct supported waiver and acquiescence. On a purposive reading of Article 32, the disqualification extended to persons connected with race horse owners, so the nomination rejection was valid; the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 did not alter that result, and the election challenge failed. en-us Fri, 27 Jul 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Dec 2019 18:53:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276804 Civil court jurisdiction was upheld to examine alleged illegality in a company-managed election where no clear statutory bar excluded ordinary civil remedies. A separate personal hearing was not required because the nomination rejection was decided after written representations, Committee consideration, and legal advice, so natural justice was not breached. A late amendment withdrawing a material admission was properly refused, and the plaintiff's conduct supported waiver and acquiescence. On a purposive reading of Article 32, the disqualification extended to persons connected with race horse owners, so the nomination rejection was valid; the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 did not alter that result, and the election challenge failed. Case-Laws Benami Property Fri, 27 Jul 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276804