<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1958 (10) TMI 56 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276803</link>
    <description>A partnership arrangement and account material were treated as sufficient to support the assessee&#039;s position; the mere fact that speculative ankdas stood in one partner&#039;s name did not, by itself, disprove that the transactions were the assessee&#039;s, and the adverse finding was unsupported by legal evidence. On the tax issue, the Income-tax Act, 1922 was read to permit a partner&#039;s share of loss from an unregistered firm to enter computation of business income, and the firm&#039;s separate assessment was not a condition precedent where the loss was established and no statutory bar applied. The assessees&#039; claimed set-off was therefore upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 1958 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2018 16:34:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=542450" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1958 (10) TMI 56 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276803</link>
      <description>A partnership arrangement and account material were treated as sufficient to support the assessee&#039;s position; the mere fact that speculative ankdas stood in one partner&#039;s name did not, by itself, disprove that the transactions were the assessee&#039;s, and the adverse finding was unsupported by legal evidence. On the tax issue, the Income-tax Act, 1922 was read to permit a partner&#039;s share of loss from an unregistered firm to enter computation of business income, and the firm&#039;s separate assessment was not a condition precedent where the loss was established and no statutory bar applied. The assessees&#039; claimed set-off was therefore upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 1958 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276803</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>