<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (6) TMI 7 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15244</link>
    <description>Hypertension was held not to amount to a permanent physical disability for deduction under section 80U of the Income-tax Act, because the provision was directed to disabilities of a physical character such as blindness, loss of hearing, sensation or movement, and the medical certificate did not certify any such disability. The certificate only described essential hypertension as controllable, not completely curable, and as reducing active working capacity. Rule 11D, which later dealt with permanent physical disabilities for section 80U, was not in force for the relevant assessment years. The deduction was therefore denied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 18:41:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=54244" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (6) TMI 7 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15244</link>
      <description>Hypertension was held not to amount to a permanent physical disability for deduction under section 80U of the Income-tax Act, because the provision was directed to disabilities of a physical character such as blindness, loss of hearing, sensation or movement, and the medical certificate did not certify any such disability. The certificate only described essential hypertension as controllable, not completely curable, and as reducing active working capacity. Rule 11D, which later dealt with permanent physical disabilities for section 80U, was not in force for the relevant assessment years. The deduction was therefore denied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15244</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>