<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1944 (4) TMI 11 - LAHORE HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276788</link>
    <description>Lump sum amounts paid on termination of employment were treated as compensation for loss of employment and therefore exempt from income-tax under Explanation 2 to Section 7(1) of the Income-tax Act. The agreement&#039;s reference to &quot;resignation&quot; was read as a formal description of termination under pressure, not a voluntary surrender of office. Because the sums were payable separately from accrued dues for past service, they were not remuneration for services rendered. The unexpired term of the contract and surrounding circumstances showed that the payment was intended to compensate the employee for loss of future employment prospects.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 1944 00:00:00 +0630</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2018 13:03:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=542427" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1944 (4) TMI 11 - LAHORE HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276788</link>
      <description>Lump sum amounts paid on termination of employment were treated as compensation for loss of employment and therefore exempt from income-tax under Explanation 2 to Section 7(1) of the Income-tax Act. The agreement&#039;s reference to &quot;resignation&quot; was read as a formal description of termination under pressure, not a voluntary surrender of office. Because the sums were payable separately from accrued dues for past service, they were not remuneration for services rendered. The unexpired term of the contract and surrounding circumstances showed that the payment was intended to compensate the employee for loss of future employment prospects.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 1944 00:00:00 +0630</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276788</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>