https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276778 A memorandum recording an earlier oral family partition does not, by itself, create or extinguish rights in immovable property and is not compulsorily registrable; it may be relied on prima facie even if one co-sharer did not sign it, particularly where the parties later acted upon the settlement. Interim injunction was also refused because the applicant failed to show a stronger equitable case: the balance of convenience, irreparable injury, and conduct of the parties favoured maintaining the existing arrangement rather than restraining development or transfer. The appeal therefore did not justify interference at the interim stage. en-us Tue, 15 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 17 Nov 2018 11:05:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276778 A memorandum recording an earlier oral family partition does not, by itself, create or extinguish rights in immovable property and is not compulsorily registrable; it may be relied on prima facie even if one co-sharer did not sign it, particularly where the parties later acted upon the settlement. Interim injunction was also refused because the applicant failed to show a stronger equitable case: the balance of convenience, irreparable injury, and conduct of the parties favoured maintaining the existing arrangement rather than restraining development or transfer. The appeal therefore did not justify interference at the interim stage. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 15 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276778