https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276773 A wrongful octroi levy may still count as an act purportedly done under the Bombay Municipal Boroughs Act, 1925 if it is made under an existing statutory power and a claimed interpretation of the rules. On that basis, section 206 notice was required before a refund claim could be maintained. The prior notice covered only the amounts and period then within scope, so later payments added by amendment could not be recovered without a fresh notice. The decree was therefore reduced, the municipality succeeded to that extent, and the broader recovery claim failed. en-us Mon, 21 Jul 1952 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 17 Nov 2018 10:02:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276773 A wrongful octroi levy may still count as an act purportedly done under the Bombay Municipal Boroughs Act, 1925 if it is made under an existing statutory power and a claimed interpretation of the rules. On that basis, section 206 notice was required before a refund claim could be maintained. The prior notice covered only the amounts and period then within scope, so later payments added by amendment could not be recovered without a fresh notice. The decree was therefore reduced, the municipality succeeded to that extent, and the broader recovery claim failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 21 Jul 1952 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276773