https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15238 The Division Bench dismissed the writ petition challenging the attachment order under the Income-tax Act, 1961, citing the availability of an alternative remedy under rule 11 of the Second Schedule. The court held that once the alternative remedy was pursued, the writ petition under article 226 of the Constitution of India could not be entertained. The Tax Recovery Officer issued an order maintaining status quo on the property and rent realization for a month. The court directed that any challenge to the Tax Recovery Officer's order could be pursued separately within a month if maintainable, with all parties instructed to act on a signed copy of the order. en-us Thu, 09 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 03 Aug 2009 18:28:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15238 The Division Bench dismissed the writ petition challenging the attachment order under the Income-tax Act, 1961, citing the availability of an alternative remedy under rule 11 of the Second Schedule. The court held that once the alternative remedy was pursued, the writ petition under article 226 of the Constitution of India could not be entertained. The Tax Recovery Officer issued an order maintaining status quo on the property and rent realization for a month. The court directed that any challenge to the Tax Recovery Officer's order could be pursued separately within a month if maintainable, with all parties instructed to act on a signed copy of the order. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 09 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15238