<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 789 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370446</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, setting aside the notice u/s 148 and quashing the reassessment. All ad-hoc disallowances were deleted as the basis for reopening the assessment was found to be incorrect. The ITAT concluded that the information provided did not support the reopening, leading to the favorable outcome for the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2018 08:01:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=542368" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 789 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370446</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, setting aside the notice u/s 148 and quashing the reassessment. All ad-hoc disallowances were deleted as the basis for reopening the assessment was found to be incorrect. The ITAT concluded that the information provided did not support the reopening, leading to the favorable outcome for the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370446</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>