<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 787 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370444</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals for statistical purposes, emphasizing fair estimation of commission income. The AO&#039;s lump sum addition without proper material was upheld, but the rate of commission was reduced to 0.30%. The Tribunal directed re-computation of interest and dismissed penalty proceedings due to no penalty being levied. The decision was applied to six similar appeals, stressing the importance of proper application of interest and penalty provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2018 08:01:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=542366" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 787 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370444</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals for statistical purposes, emphasizing fair estimation of commission income. The AO&#039;s lump sum addition without proper material was upheld, but the rate of commission was reduced to 0.30%. The Tribunal directed re-computation of interest and dismissed penalty proceedings due to no penalty being levied. The decision was applied to six similar appeals, stressing the importance of proper application of interest and penalty provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370444</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>