<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 778 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370435</link>
    <description>Land placed with a statutory industrial development corporation for development purposes, while remaining subject to governmental control and a right of reversion, is not treated as an absolute transfer of ownership for income-tax purposes. On that basis, lease premium, rent and interest arising from such lands are not assessable in the corporation&#039;s hands merely because it manages or leases the lands. The text also states that such an arrangement may amount to a revocable transfer under section 61, with income-tax consequences following that characterisation. In addition, a reimbursement claim requires factual verification, depreciation already allowed must be given effect to, and income cannot be enhanced beyond the original assessment when merely implementing limited appellate directions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2025 11:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=542357" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 778 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370435</link>
      <description>Land placed with a statutory industrial development corporation for development purposes, while remaining subject to governmental control and a right of reversion, is not treated as an absolute transfer of ownership for income-tax purposes. On that basis, lease premium, rent and interest arising from such lands are not assessable in the corporation&#039;s hands merely because it manages or leases the lands. The text also states that such an arrangement may amount to a revocable transfer under section 61, with income-tax consequences following that characterisation. In addition, a reimbursement claim requires factual verification, depreciation already allowed must be given effect to, and income cannot be enhanced beyond the original assessment when merely implementing limited appellate directions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370435</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>