<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 777 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370434</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing the AO to exempt the interest income under section 10(15)(iv), exclude certain investments while computing disallowance under Rule 8D(2)(iii), and provide the correct TDS credit to the assessee. The decision was based on the principles of consistency, relevant case law, and proper application of tax provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2018 08:00:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=542356" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 777 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370434</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing the AO to exempt the interest income under section 10(15)(iv), exclude certain investments while computing disallowance under Rule 8D(2)(iii), and provide the correct TDS credit to the assessee. The decision was based on the principles of consistency, relevant case law, and proper application of tax provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370434</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>