<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 773 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370430</link>
    <description>The Court, in a challenge to an order rejecting duty credit scrips application, ruled in favor of the petitioners. The Court found that previous decisions supporting the petitioners&#039; claim were binding on the respondents. As the respondents did not contest these rulings, the Court quashed the order and directed the respondents to approve the application within nine weeks.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2018 08:00:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=542352" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 773 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370430</link>
      <description>The Court, in a challenge to an order rejecting duty credit scrips application, ruled in favor of the petitioners. The Court found that previous decisions supporting the petitioners&#039; claim were binding on the respondents. As the respondents did not contest these rulings, the Court quashed the order and directed the respondents to approve the application within nine weeks.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370430</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>