<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 770 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370427</link>
    <description>A pending request for extension of time to fulfil export obligation could not be reopened by demanding an enhanced composition fee after the petitioner had already paid the earlier accepted fee. Where prospective extension had already been directed for consideration, the Department was bound by that direction and could not impose a fresh monetary condition on a different footing to defeat it. The additional demand was therefore beyond authority and illegal, and the petitioner was entitled to prospective extension without any further fee demand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2018 07:59:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=542349" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 770 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370427</link>
      <description>A pending request for extension of time to fulfil export obligation could not be reopened by demanding an enhanced composition fee after the petitioner had already paid the earlier accepted fee. Where prospective extension had already been directed for consideration, the Department was bound by that direction and could not impose a fresh monetary condition on a different footing to defeat it. The additional demand was therefore beyond authority and illegal, and the petitioner was entitled to prospective extension without any further fee demand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370427</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>