<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 761 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370418</link>
    <description>Appeal was permitted to be withdrawn because the tax amount involved fell below the Board&#039;s monetary threshold of Rs. 50 lakhs. The withdrawal was granted without any acceptance or endorsement of the Tribunal&#039;s order, and the legal questions were expressly left open for consideration in an appropriate case. The operative effect is that the matter was not decided on merits and no precedent was created on the underlying issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2018 07:59:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=542340" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 761 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370418</link>
      <description>Appeal was permitted to be withdrawn because the tax amount involved fell below the Board&#039;s monetary threshold of Rs. 50 lakhs. The withdrawal was granted without any acceptance or endorsement of the Tribunal&#039;s order, and the legal questions were expressly left open for consideration in an appropriate case. The operative effect is that the matter was not decided on merits and no precedent was created on the underlying issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370418</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>