<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 756 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370413</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the demands and penalties imposed. The services related to construction of Tailing Dams were not taxable under &quot;Site Formation Services&quot; as they did not fall under works contract services. Additionally, services related to desilting of Tailing Dams were excluded from taxation under &quot;Site Formation Services&quot; due to their nature of repairing water bodies. The Tribunal also considered a Board Circular, concluding that the appellant&#039;s services were not independently taxable. The Department&#039;s appeal for penalty imposition was dismissed, and the impugned orders were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2018 07:59:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=542335" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 756 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370413</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the demands and penalties imposed. The services related to construction of Tailing Dams were not taxable under &quot;Site Formation Services&quot; as they did not fall under works contract services. Additionally, services related to desilting of Tailing Dams were excluded from taxation under &quot;Site Formation Services&quot; due to their nature of repairing water bodies. The Tribunal also considered a Board Circular, concluding that the appellant&#039;s services were not independently taxable. The Department&#039;s appeal for penalty imposition was dismissed, and the impugned orders were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370413</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>