<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 749 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370406</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, remanding the matter to the adjudicating authority to address the issues of abatement of property tax for 2008-09 and the inclusion of rent dues for the period prior to 01.06.2007 in the demand. The Tribunal also set aside the penalties imposed under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, considering the interpretational nature of the issue regarding the levy of service tax on Renting of Immovable Property.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2018 07:58:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=542328" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 749 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370406</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, remanding the matter to the adjudicating authority to address the issues of abatement of property tax for 2008-09 and the inclusion of rent dues for the period prior to 01.06.2007 in the demand. The Tribunal also set aside the penalties imposed under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, considering the interpretational nature of the issue regarding the levy of service tax on Renting of Immovable Property.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370406</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>