https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370404 The appellant contested liability for service tax on renting immovable property, claiming exemption under Notification No. 6/2005-ST. The Tribunal remanded the case for fresh consideration of cum-tax benefit and abatement under Notification No.24/2007-ST. Penalties under sections 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, were set aside due to confusion on service tax levy. The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing reconsideration of cum-tax benefit, exemption under Notification No. 6/2005-ST, abatement for property tax, and waiver of penalties under Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994. en-us Mon, 01 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 17 Nov 2018 07:58:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370404 The appellant contested liability for service tax on renting immovable property, claiming exemption under Notification No. 6/2005-ST. The Tribunal remanded the case for fresh consideration of cum-tax benefit and abatement under Notification No.24/2007-ST. Penalties under sections 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, were set aside due to confusion on service tax levy. The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing reconsideration of cum-tax benefit, exemption under Notification No. 6/2005-ST, abatement for property tax, and waiver of penalties under Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 01 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370404