https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370401 The appellant's contention that their services do not fall under erection, commissioning, or installation services but under commercial or industrial construction services was upheld by the Tribunal. The Tribunal found that the services provided by the appellant were more aligned with commercial or industrial construction services based on an analysis of work orders and contracts. The demand for service tax was considered barred by the period of limitation, and the Tribunal concluded that the services provided did not fit within the definitions of erection, commissioning, or installation services as per the Finance Act, 1994. en-us Tue, 21 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 17 Nov 2018 07:58:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370401 The appellant's contention that their services do not fall under erection, commissioning, or installation services but under commercial or industrial construction services was upheld by the Tribunal. The Tribunal found that the services provided by the appellant were more aligned with commercial or industrial construction services based on an analysis of work orders and contracts. The demand for service tax was considered barred by the period of limitation, and the Tribunal concluded that the services provided did not fit within the definitions of erection, commissioning, or installation services as per the Finance Act, 1994. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 21 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370401