<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 739 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370396</link>
    <description>The appeal involved availing CENVAT credit without ISD registration and eligibility of credit for professional charges. The appellant reversed the credit before the notice and argued for the penalty to be set aside. The Member (Judicial) referred to a previous judgment, concluding the penalty could not be sustained. The penalty was set aside, partially allowing the appeal with consequential relief, while upholding the rest of the order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2018 07:57:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=542318" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 739 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370396</link>
      <description>The appeal involved availing CENVAT credit without ISD registration and eligibility of credit for professional charges. The appellant reversed the credit before the notice and argued for the penalty to be set aside. The Member (Judicial) referred to a previous judgment, concluding the penalty could not be sustained. The penalty was set aside, partially allowing the appeal with consequential relief, while upholding the rest of the order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370396</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>