https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370385 The Tribunal found that the Revenue's challenge to the order dropping the demand and vacating the seizure was unsupported by any substantial ground. The appeal contained only a vague allegation that the Commissioner had wrongly assessed the circumstances, without identifying any specific factual or legal error in the appeal memo or review order. On that basis, the Tribunal treated the appeal as mechanically filed and lacking application of mind, and held that no basis existed to disturb the order under challenge. The Revenue's challenge was therefore rejected on merits. en-us Fri, 12 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 17 Nov 2018 07:57:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370385 The Tribunal found that the Revenue's challenge to the order dropping the demand and vacating the seizure was unsupported by any substantial ground. The appeal contained only a vague allegation that the Commissioner had wrongly assessed the circumstances, without identifying any specific factual or legal error in the appeal memo or review order. On that basis, the Tribunal treated the appeal as mechanically filed and lacking application of mind, and held that no basis existed to disturb the order under challenge. The Revenue's challenge was therefore rejected on merits. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 12 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370385