<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 725 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370382</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed on the appellant under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944, due to the absence of fraudulent intent or suppression of facts, aligning with precedents where penalties under Section 11AC were not upheld in similar situations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2018 07:57:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=542304" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 725 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370382</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed on the appellant under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944, due to the absence of fraudulent intent or suppression of facts, aligning with precedents where penalties under Section 11AC were not upheld in similar situations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370382</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>