https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370381 The Tribunal dismissed the application for restoration of an appeal that was previously dismissed for non-compliance with the pre-deposit requirement under section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Despite the applicant's belated compliance efforts and procedural deficiencies, the Tribunal emphasized the significance of diligence in pursuing legal remedies. Citing legal precedents, the Tribunal highlighted the importance of substantial justice over technical considerations and the limitations on its authority in cases disposed of by the High Court. The decision underscored the necessity of adhering to legal requirements and demonstrating bonafides in seeking appeal restoration. en-us Thu, 04 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 17 Nov 2018 07:57:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370381 The Tribunal dismissed the application for restoration of an appeal that was previously dismissed for non-compliance with the pre-deposit requirement under section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Despite the applicant's belated compliance efforts and procedural deficiencies, the Tribunal emphasized the significance of diligence in pursuing legal remedies. Citing legal precedents, the Tribunal highlighted the importance of substantial justice over technical considerations and the limitations on its authority in cases disposed of by the High Court. The decision underscored the necessity of adhering to legal requirements and demonstrating bonafides in seeking appeal restoration. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 04 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370381