https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370376 The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeals, ruling in favor of the appellant regarding the valuation of goods cleared between related companies. It was held that the valuation under Rule 8 & 9 of the Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000 was not applicable as some goods were also cleared to independent buyers. The Tribunal emphasized that Rule 4 should be preferred for determining value in such cases, leading to the dismissal of the demand for differential duty and penalty. en-us Thu, 27 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 17 Nov 2018 07:57:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370376 The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeals, ruling in favor of the appellant regarding the valuation of goods cleared between related companies. It was held that the valuation under Rule 8 & 9 of the Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000 was not applicable as some goods were also cleared to independent buyers. The Tribunal emphasized that Rule 4 should be preferred for determining value in such cases, leading to the dismissal of the demand for differential duty and penalty. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 27 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370376