<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 717 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370374</link>
    <description>A person with a direct and substantial interest in attached property may qualify as an aggrieved person for purposes of an amnesty scheme, including where the interest is asserted through a representative capacity or as a successor to the owner&#039;s interest. The petitioners were found to have a strong stake in the property attached for recovery of tax arrears: one had obtained a sale certificate in execution of her matrimonial claim, and the other was treated as acting for her mother and as a dependent with an interest in the father&#039;s estate. The rejection was set aside and the authorities were directed to reconsider the application under the applicable scheme.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2018 07:56:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=542296" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 717 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370374</link>
      <description>A person with a direct and substantial interest in attached property may qualify as an aggrieved person for purposes of an amnesty scheme, including where the interest is asserted through a representative capacity or as a successor to the owner&#039;s interest. The petitioners were found to have a strong stake in the property attached for recovery of tax arrears: one had obtained a sale certificate in execution of her matrimonial claim, and the other was treated as acting for her mother and as a dependent with an interest in the father&#039;s estate. The rejection was set aside and the authorities were directed to reconsider the application under the applicable scheme.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370374</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>