<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1771 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276769</link>
    <description>The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) held that all financial creditors should be treated equally in a resolution plan, regardless of their support or dissent. The Tribunal invalidated specific provisions in the Resolution Plan that mandated different treatment for operational and dissenting financial creditors, emphasizing alignment with the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The Successful Resolution Applicant&#039;s equal treatment of creditors was upheld, and the appellant was prohibited from discriminating against dissenting creditors. The NCLAT clarified the limitations of the Board&#039;s authority in determining creditor payments and dismissed the appeal without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2018 07:52:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=542288" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1771 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276769</link>
      <description>The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) held that all financial creditors should be treated equally in a resolution plan, regardless of their support or dissent. The Tribunal invalidated specific provisions in the Resolution Plan that mandated different treatment for operational and dissenting financial creditors, emphasizing alignment with the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The Successful Resolution Applicant&#039;s equal treatment of creditors was upheld, and the appellant was prohibited from discriminating against dissenting creditors. The NCLAT clarified the limitations of the Board&#039;s authority in determining creditor payments and dismissed the appeal without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276769</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>