https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370371 The court upheld the Directorate General of Central Excise Intelligence's (DGCEI) jurisdiction to conduct centralized investigations and issue summons under Section 14 of the Central Excise Act. The writ petition was dismissed, vacating interim orders restraining DGCEI, except for matters covered by a show cause notice from the Patna Commissionerate. The limitation period for issuing show cause notices under the Finance Act excluded the period of the stay order. The court did not address the chargeability of service tax on Project Management Consultancy Charges, leaving it for future adjudication. en-us Fri, 16 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 06 Apr 2019 17:41:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370371 The court upheld the Directorate General of Central Excise Intelligence's (DGCEI) jurisdiction to conduct centralized investigations and issue summons under Section 14 of the Central Excise Act. The writ petition was dismissed, vacating interim orders restraining DGCEI, except for matters covered by a show cause notice from the Patna Commissionerate. The limitation period for issuing show cause notices under the Finance Act excluded the period of the stay order. The court did not address the chargeability of service tax on Project Management Consultancy Charges, leaving it for future adjudication. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 16 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370371