<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1962 (1) TMI 81 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276751</link>
    <description>Under the unamended section 44 of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, dissolution of a partnership was treated as discontinuance of the firm&#039;s business, so the assessment machinery could be used against persons who were partners at dissolution on a joint and several basis for the firm&#039;s pre-dissolution income. The 1958 amendment was described as clarificatory rather than as creating the liability for the first time. On that construction, a notice under section 34 addressed to a partner as such was not invalid merely because the firm had been dissolved, and the reassessment proceedings were treated as valid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2018 17:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=542258" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1962 (1) TMI 81 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276751</link>
      <description>Under the unamended section 44 of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, dissolution of a partnership was treated as discontinuance of the firm&#039;s business, so the assessment machinery could be used against persons who were partners at dissolution on a joint and several basis for the firm&#039;s pre-dissolution income. The 1958 amendment was described as clarificatory rather than as creating the liability for the first time. On that construction, a notice under section 34 addressed to a partner as such was not invalid merely because the firm had been dissolved, and the reassessment proceedings were treated as valid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276751</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>