<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 713 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370370</link>
    <description>Towers, shelters and related telecom infrastructure fabricated in CKD condition and fixed to civil foundations only for stability were held not to be immovable property, because the attachment was not permanent annexation. They were treated as eligible capital goods or, alternatively, inputs under the CENVAT Credit Rules, since they formed part of an integrated BTS system used for providing telecom services. MS angles, channels and similar fabrication materials also qualified for credit because their nexus with the output service was direct and integral. Credit was admissible on receipt of the goods, and a later intermediate stage of immovable assembly did not defeat entitlement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2025 12:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=542246" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 713 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370370</link>
      <description>Towers, shelters and related telecom infrastructure fabricated in CKD condition and fixed to civil foundations only for stability were held not to be immovable property, because the attachment was not permanent annexation. They were treated as eligible capital goods or, alternatively, inputs under the CENVAT Credit Rules, since they formed part of an integrated BTS system used for providing telecom services. MS angles, channels and similar fabrication materials also qualified for credit because their nexus with the output service was direct and integral. Credit was admissible on receipt of the goods, and a later intermediate stage of immovable assembly did not defeat entitlement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370370</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>