<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1961 (3) TMI 127 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276739</link>
    <description>Receipts from the sale of loom hours were capital receipts because the loom hours formed part of the assessee&#039;s profit-making structure rather than its trading operations. The surplus hours could not be fully used due to inadequacy in the preparatory section, and their transfer for value exhausted the asset in the transferee&#039;s hands. The amounts were therefore not profits from business and could not be treated as casual or non-recurring business income under the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2018 15:25:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=542235" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1961 (3) TMI 127 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276739</link>
      <description>Receipts from the sale of loom hours were capital receipts because the loom hours formed part of the assessee&#039;s profit-making structure rather than its trading operations. The surplus hours could not be fully used due to inadequacy in the preparatory section, and their transfer for value exhausted the asset in the transferee&#039;s hands. The amounts were therefore not profits from business and could not be treated as casual or non-recurring business income under the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276739</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>