<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1963 (2) TMI 66 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276738</link>
    <description>A valid notification under section 60A granting full exemption for specified interest on tax-free securities prevailed over the computational machinery of section 8 of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922. Because the notification separately governed inclusion of the interest for section 16 purposes, the Explanation to section 8 could not be used to reduce the exemption or restrict the rebate. The broader argument that &quot;State Government&quot; in the third proviso should be confined to former Provincial Governments was rejected as unsupported by the statutory language. The interest was accordingly entitled to rebate of income-tax, and the reference was answered in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2018 15:18:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=542234" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1963 (2) TMI 66 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276738</link>
      <description>A valid notification under section 60A granting full exemption for specified interest on tax-free securities prevailed over the computational machinery of section 8 of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922. Because the notification separately governed inclusion of the interest for section 16 purposes, the Explanation to section 8 could not be used to reduce the exemption or restrict the rebate. The broader argument that &quot;State Government&quot; in the third proviso should be confined to former Provincial Governments was rejected as unsupported by the statutory language. The interest was accordingly entitled to rebate of income-tax, and the reference was answered in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276738</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>