https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276726 After severance of status in a joint Hindu family, the father's representative capacity ends, so a decree obtained against him alone cannot be executed against the sons' separated shares unless the sons are impleaded and properly represented in execution. The court held that although joint family property may remain liable for the father's antecedent debts, the sale here could bind only the father's interest because the sons were not made parties after partition. It also held that lis pendens did not apply to a money execution proceeding, and Section 64 CPC did not validate sale of unrepresented shares. en-us Tue, 21 Sep 1948 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Nov 2018 14:32:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276726 After severance of status in a joint Hindu family, the father's representative capacity ends, so a decree obtained against him alone cannot be executed against the sons' separated shares unless the sons are impleaded and properly represented in execution. The court held that although joint family property may remain liable for the father's antecedent debts, the sale here could bind only the father's interest because the sons were not made parties after partition. It also held that lis pendens did not apply to a money execution proceeding, and Section 64 CPC did not validate sale of unrepresented shares. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 21 Sep 1948 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276726