<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1961 (4) TMI 124 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276717</link>
    <description>Property voluntarily thrown by a coparcener into the Hindu joint family hotch-pot becomes joint family property, and a later partition among family members remains a separate and genuine transaction. On that footing, a transfer to a Hindu undivided family is only a transfer to an assessable unit and does not, by itself, amount to an indirect transfer to the transferor&#039;s wife or minor son under section 16(3)(a)(iii) or section 16(3)(a)(iv) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922. The income attributed to the family could not be clubbed in the transferor&#039;s hands under those clauses, because no direct or indirect transfer to the wife or minor child was disclosed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2018 12:39:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=542196" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1961 (4) TMI 124 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276717</link>
      <description>Property voluntarily thrown by a coparcener into the Hindu joint family hotch-pot becomes joint family property, and a later partition among family members remains a separate and genuine transaction. On that footing, a transfer to a Hindu undivided family is only a transfer to an assessable unit and does not, by itself, amount to an indirect transfer to the transferor&#039;s wife or minor son under section 16(3)(a)(iii) or section 16(3)(a)(iv) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922. The income attributed to the family could not be clubbed in the transferor&#039;s hands under those clauses, because no direct or indirect transfer to the wife or minor child was disclosed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276717</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>