<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1940 (8) TMI 31 - RANGOON HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276715</link>
    <description>A succession under Section 26(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1922 arises only if the succeeding persons take over the business as a whole. On the stated facts, the Rangoon activity was part of a single joint family concern run under common organisation and central control, with branch accounts folded into the family accounts and the same banking and money-lending business carried on at several places. Capital allocation and interest entries did not show separate businesses, and earlier tax treatment supported the single-business character. The partition and continuation of the Rangoon branch by the brothers therefore did not amount to succession to a distinct business.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 1940 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2018 12:20:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=542192" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1940 (8) TMI 31 - RANGOON HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276715</link>
      <description>A succession under Section 26(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1922 arises only if the succeeding persons take over the business as a whole. On the stated facts, the Rangoon activity was part of a single joint family concern run under common organisation and central control, with branch accounts folded into the family accounts and the same banking and money-lending business carried on at several places. Capital allocation and interest entries did not show separate businesses, and earlier tax treatment supported the single-business character. The partition and continuation of the Rangoon branch by the brothers therefore did not amount to succession to a distinct business.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 1940 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276715</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>