<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1950 (4) TMI 21 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276713</link>
    <description>An unregistered partition instrument that embodies the full partition arrangement, including allotment of properties, equalisation payments, debts and mutual indemnity, is treated as creating rights in presenti and therefore requires registration; if unregistered, it is inadmissible in evidence. A partition arrangement also does not fall within Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act because partition is not a transfer of immovable property for consideration: it only converts joint enjoyment into separate enjoyment based on antecedent title. Accordingly, possession claimed under such an arrangement cannot be protected by part performance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 1950 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2018 11:55:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=542188" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1950 (4) TMI 21 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276713</link>
      <description>An unregistered partition instrument that embodies the full partition arrangement, including allotment of properties, equalisation payments, debts and mutual indemnity, is treated as creating rights in presenti and therefore requires registration; if unregistered, it is inadmissible in evidence. A partition arrangement also does not fall within Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act because partition is not a transfer of immovable property for consideration: it only converts joint enjoyment into separate enjoyment based on antecedent title. Accordingly, possession claimed under such an arrangement cannot be protected by part performance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 1950 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276713</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>