https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276710 The High Court held that the sale deed dated 24th May, 1944 was valid and binding against the plaintiff. The court found that the transaction was supported by legal necessity due to the plaintiff's prolonged absence and the family's financial distress. Additionally, the court recognized the competency of a female to act as Karta of a Hindu joint family in certain circumstances, as well as the validity of alienation by non-Karta family members under Hindu law. As a result, the lower court's decisions were overturned, and the plaintiff's suit was dismissed with costs. en-us Tue, 03 Sep 1957 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Nov 2018 11:21:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276710 The High Court held that the sale deed dated 24th May, 1944 was valid and binding against the plaintiff. The court found that the transaction was supported by legal necessity due to the plaintiff's prolonged absence and the family's financial distress. Additionally, the court recognized the competency of a female to act as Karta of a Hindu joint family in certain circumstances, as well as the validity of alienation by non-Karta family members under Hindu law. As a result, the lower court's decisions were overturned, and the plaintiff's suit was dismissed with costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 03 Sep 1957 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276710