https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276709 In expropriation compensation, factual findings supported by evidence were not disturbed where the arbitrator found no special value as a water-power site, no proved hunting and shooting value, and no basis to reject the severance damage assessment. Fishing rights over the expropriated area were compensable because the evidence showed real value in those rights, so the allowance was upheld. Interest on compensation was also payable from the date possession was taken, because the statute did not exclude that incident of full indemnity and the right to interest replaced the owner's right to retain possession. en-us Fri, 20 Jul 1928 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Nov 2018 11:18:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276709 In expropriation compensation, factual findings supported by evidence were not disturbed where the arbitrator found no special value as a water-power site, no proved hunting and shooting value, and no basis to reject the severance damage assessment. Fishing rights over the expropriated area were compensable because the evidence showed real value in those rights, so the allowance was upheld. Interest on compensation was also payable from the date possession was taken, because the statute did not exclude that incident of full indemnity and the right to interest replaced the owner's right to retain possession. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 20 Jul 1928 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276709