https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276701 A partnership at will is not dissolved unless a written notice under Section 43 clearly and finally communicates an intention to dissolve the firm to all partners. The notices relied on merely sought accounts and adjustment and did not amount to dissolution; the parties' conduct also showed continuity of the firm, including after a partner's death. Limitation therefore did not bar the suit for accounts. The evidence further supported one continuing partnership from 1895, so the accounts were properly directed to be taken from that year. The appeal and cross-objection failed, and the decree for accounts was maintained. en-us Fri, 22 Oct 1954 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Nov 2018 10:38:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276701 A partnership at will is not dissolved unless a written notice under Section 43 clearly and finally communicates an intention to dissolve the firm to all partners. The notices relied on merely sought accounts and adjustment and did not amount to dissolution; the parties' conduct also showed continuity of the firm, including after a partner's death. Limitation therefore did not bar the suit for accounts. The evidence further supported one continuing partnership from 1895, so the accounts were properly directed to be taken from that year. The appeal and cross-objection failed, and the decree for accounts was maintained. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 22 Oct 1954 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276701