<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (9) TMI 11 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15215</link>
    <description>The High Court of Madras clarified that interest paid on loans incurred in earlier years should be allowed to be deducted under section 5(e) regardless of the borrowing purpose. The court differentiated between crop loans and replanting loans, allowing deductions for interest on replanting and development loans under section 5(e) for the assessment years 1983-84 and 1984-85, partially allowing the revision petitions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 17:22:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=54215" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (9) TMI 11 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15215</link>
      <description>The High Court of Madras clarified that interest paid on loans incurred in earlier years should be allowed to be deducted under section 5(e) regardless of the borrowing purpose. The court differentiated between crop loans and replanting loans, allowing deductions for interest on replanting and development loans under section 5(e) for the assessment years 1983-84 and 1984-85, partially allowing the revision petitions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15215</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>